>> Okay, you're going to (fairly) point out this makes things harder. >> I can't disagree with that. It's just ... we're starting to now >> grapple with some truely hard problems, like how exactly a MIME >> reply is supposed to work. This is something a lot of MUAs don't >> deal with very well. I think we owe it to ourselves to try to get >> it right. > >I'm not sure what "right" is here. Can we have a cleaner >interface to accept a calendar request than what's on phones >now? No, clicking on "accept" is as simple as it can get. >As a user, I'd be happy to use repl or some shell alias to do >it.
I was more thinking about preserving MH's historic flexibility. I guess my point was I'd prefer something like this (all are aliases to 'repl') calaccept: -typearg text/calendar accept calreject: -typearg text/calendar reject Rather than: calaccept: -calendar accept calreject: -calendar reject Does that make sense? I don't really like the name 'typearg', I was just trying to make the point that I'd like the options to repl be able to be used for any MIME type. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
