>Which actually lead me to another thought: maybe we should >at least _respect_ dot lock (i.e. do not allow writing to a dotlocked >file) but create dot lock only if that particular locking is >requested.
That might be a bit architecturally hard. Personally, I am not sure about doing that; the locking code is already pretty complicated (witness the bugs you found) and I am reluctant to add more complexity. Since the locking can be configured at runtime, it's easy for a user to fix it if it is wrong. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
