Marcin wrote: > >> David Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > > Using setegid() is ok according to POSIX.1-2004, it was previously > just a BSD extension.
Thanks. Committed. I also added a check for success of setegid(), and adios() on failure. > >> I was also wondering if we should give the user to abort waiting > >> for a lock with ^C. > > > > I tried, and ^C works for me (on Linux). > > That's interesting, from what I see in the inc code SIGINT is > trapped in inc.c, lines 513++ ? And that code is conditional on trnflag. I was testing with -file, which didn't use it. It looks like the signal handlers are there to avoid corruption when the mailbox would be modified. I think they should be retained. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
