Thus said Ralph Corderoy on Sun, 22 Feb 2015 19:07:06 +0000: > You guess wrong. It is useful. I'm declaring what's valid and > interested parties can use it, and I've seen they do, to help judge > what they've received.
By the way, my apologies for using your domain as an example. I could have just as easily setup a separate subdomain for this test. I was so surprised to actually find a domain that used -all that I immediately put on my ``for science'' hat and proceeded to test. > Did Hotmail accept the message over SMTP, or also deliver it to your > inbox? What was the detail of their spam judgement, e.g. based on > its headers? (Using Hotmail as an arbiter of quality!? Would be > interesting to hear what Gmail does.) Yes, Hotmail accepted the message over SMTP from a non-approved IP address and delivered it the Spam folder. I'll conduct a better experiment later to see if there is a difference in spam judgement. > (BTW, fully-justified text to 72 characters on a TTY is a pain to > read, especially when long `words' are common meaning every space has > to be two spaces on some lines, presumably more sometimes.) Interesting observation. I've always found it to be the opposite and you're actually the first to have mentioned it. At least for me, I find that having the text wrapped at odd places, or not wrapped at all depending on the terminal/software displaying it, is much more difficult. Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000000054ea2b4d _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
