> On Mar 11, 2016, at 9:09 PM, Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > There was a guy on this mailing list who's name escapes me right now ... > who was a real bear when it came to insisting that nmh should stick to > 100% POSIX compatibility. You should talk to him. What was his name > again ....?
Oh bite me! :-) You know this sort of thing falls well outside POSIX. It would be inside a non-portability #ifdef. But if you want me to get all pedantic, I could write a protocol interface, spoken through a named socket - which is POSIX portable - through which anyone could write their own message store interface adapters as external interfaces. Actually, that's my preferred scheme. But it's not trivial to do – on either side – so FUSE seemed like a more practical solution. --lyndon _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
