nmh-workers  

Messages by Date

• 2018/07/23 Re: [nmh-workers] Reproducible build patch valdis . kletnieks
• 2018/07/23 Re: [nmh-workers] Reproducible build patch Ken Hornstein
• 2018/07/23 Re: [nmh-workers] Reproducible build patch valdis . kletnieks
• 2018/07/23 [nmh-workers] Reproducible build patch Ken Hornstein
• 2018/07/18 Re: [nmh-workers] How big a message should I accept? Ken Hornstein
• 2018/07/18 Re: [nmh-workers] How big a message should I accept? David Malone
• 2018/07/18 Re: [nmh-workers] How big a message should I accept? Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/07/18 Re: [nmh-workers] How big a message should I accept? David Malone
• 2018/07/04 Re: [nmh-workers] How big a message should I accept? David Levine
• 2018/07/04 Re: [nmh-workers] How big a message should I accept? Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/07/03 Re: [nmh-workers] How big a message should I accept? Ken Hornstein
• 2018/07/03 [nmh-workers] How big a message should I accept? norm
• 2018/07/02 Re: [nmh-workers] mhbuild(1)'s `-check' Belongs to Another. David Levine
• 2018/07/02 Re: [nmh-workers] mhbuild(1)'s `-check' Belongs to Another. valdis . kletnieks
• 2018/07/01 Re: [nmh-workers] Killing Content-MD5 support Ken Hornstein
• 2018/07/01 Re: [nmh-workers] Killing Content-MD5 support David Levine
• 2018/07/01 [nmh-workers] Killing Content-MD5 support Ken Hornstein
• 2018/07/01 Re: [nmh-workers] Problem With inc Not Sending Passwords After Upgrade To 1.7.1 Ken Hornstein
• 2018/06/30 Re: [nmh-workers] Problem With inc Not Sending Passwords After Upgrade To 1.7.1 Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/06/30 [nmh-workers] Problem With inc Not Sending Passwords After Upgrade To 1.7.1 Darren Provine
• 2018/06/29 Re: [nmh-workers] mhbuild(1)'s `-check' Belongs to Another. Ken Hornstein
• 2018/06/29 Re: [nmh-workers] mhbuild(1)'s `-check' Belongs to Another. Ken Hornstein
• 2018/06/29 Re: [nmh-workers] mhbuild(1)'s `-check' Belongs to Another. David Levine
• 2018/06/29 [nmh-workers] mhbuild(1)'s `-check' Belongs to Another. Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/06/26 Re: [nmh-workers] Old MH Source. David Levine
• 2018/06/26 Re: [nmh-workers] Old MH Source. David Malone
• 2018/06/26 [nmh-workers] Old MH Source. Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/06/20 Re: [nmh-workers] A discovered Resource David Levine
• 2018/06/20 [nmh-workers] A discovered Resource Martin McCormick
• 2018/06/20 Re: [nmh-workers] mhshow and Headers Robert Elz
• 2018/06/20 Re: [nmh-workers] mhshow and Headers Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/06/20 Re: [nmh-workers] mhshow and Headers Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/06/20 Re: [nmh-workers] mhshow and Headers Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/06/20 Re: [nmh-workers] mhshow and Headers Ken Hornstein
• 2018/06/20 Re: [nmh-workers] mhshow and Headers Martin McCormick
• 2018/06/20 [nmh-workers] mhshow and Headers Martin McCormick
• 2018/06/16 Re: [nmh-workers] The message Body Shows but the Subject doesn't Decode. Martin McCormick
• 2018/06/16 Re: [nmh-workers] The message Body Shows but the Subject doesn't Decode. Martin McCormick
• 2018/06/16 Re: [nmh-workers] The message Body Shows but the Subject doesn't Decode. Leonardo Taccari
• 2018/06/16 Re: [nmh-workers] The message Body Shows but the Subject doesn't Decode. Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/06/16 [nmh-workers] The message Body Shows but the Subject doesn't Decode. Martin McCormick
• 2018/06/15 Re: [nmh-workers] can comp return the filename of the newly created draft? Eduardo Alvarez
• 2018/06/15 Re: [nmh-workers] can comp return the filename of the newly created draft? Eduardo Alvarez
• 2018/06/15 Re: [nmh-workers] can comp return the filename of the newly created draft? hymie
• 2018/06/15 Re: [nmh-workers] can comp return the filename of the newly created draft? Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/06/15 Re: [nmh-workers] can comp return the filename of the newly created draft? Ken Hornstein
• 2018/06/15 [nmh-workers] can comp return the filename of the newly created draft? Eduardo Alvarez
• 2018/06/14 Re: [nmh-workers] Cleaning up old messages David Levine
• 2018/06/14 Re: [nmh-workers] Cleaning up old messages Peter Davis
• 2018/06/14 Re: [nmh-workers] Cleaning up old messages Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/06/14 Re: [nmh-workers] Cleaning up old messages Ken Hornstein
• 2018/06/14 [nmh-workers] Cleaning up old messages Peter Davis
• 2018/06/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Help! Cyber
• 2018/06/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Help! Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/06/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Help! Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/06/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Help! norm
• 2018/06/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Help! David Levine
• 2018/06/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Help! λ
• 2018/06/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Help! David Levine
• 2018/06/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Help! Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/06/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Help! David Levine
• 2018/06/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Help! Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/06/02 [nmh-workers] Help! norm
• 2018/05/30 Re: [nmh-workers] mts.conf relative sendmail option Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/30 Re: [nmh-workers] mts.conf relative sendmail option David Levine
• 2018/05/29 Re: [nmh-workers] mts.conf relative sendmail option Cyber
• 2018/05/29 Re: [nmh-workers] mts.conf relative sendmail option David Levine
• 2018/05/29 Re: [nmh-workers] mts.conf relative sendmail option Ken Hornstein
• 2018/05/29 Re: [nmh-workers] mts.conf relative sendmail option David Levine
• 2018/05/29 Re: [nmh-workers] mts.conf relative sendmail option Ken Hornstein
• 2018/05/29 Re: [nmh-workers] mts.conf relative sendmail option Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/29 Re: [nmh-workers] mts.conf relative sendmail option Cyber
• 2018/05/29 Re: [nmh-workers] mts.conf relative sendmail option Ken Hornstein
• 2018/05/29 Re: [nmh-workers] mts.conf relative sendmail option Cyber
• 2018/05/29 Re: [nmh-workers] mts.conf relative sendmail option Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/29 [nmh-workers] mts.conf relative sendmail option Cyber
• 2018/05/27 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Michael Richardson
• 2018/05/27 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs David Levine
• 2018/05/27 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Bob Carragher
• 2018/05/27 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ken Hornstein
• 2018/05/27 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/27 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs David Levine
• 2018/05/27 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/27 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/27 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/26 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Anthony J. Bentley
• 2018/05/26 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ken Hornstein
• 2018/05/26 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs David Levine
• 2018/05/26 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/26 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Anthony J. Bentley
• 2018/05/26 Re: [nmh-workers] sndmail program with parameters? Eduardo Alvarez
• 2018/05/26 Re: [nmh-workers] sndmail program with parameters? Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/26 [nmh-workers] sndmail program with parameters? Eduardo Alvarez
• 2018/05/26 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/26 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Bob Carragher
• 2018/05/26 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs David Levine
• 2018/05/26 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/26 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/26 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Jon Fairbairn
• 2018/05/25 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ken Hornstein
• 2018/05/25 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs nmh
• 2018/05/25 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Michael Richardson
• 2018/05/25 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/25 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Andy Bradford
• 2018/05/24 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ken Hornstein
• 2018/05/24 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs David Levine
• 2018/05/24 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ken Hornstein
• 2018/05/24 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs David Levine
• 2018/05/24 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ken Hornstein
• 2018/05/24 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/24 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs nmh
• 2018/05/23 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs David Levine
• 2018/05/23 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ken Hornstein
• 2018/05/23 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs nmh
• 2018/05/23 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ken Hornstein
• 2018/05/23 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs nmh
• 2018/05/23 Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/23 [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs nmh
• 2018/05/16 [nmh-workers] The neatmail MUA. Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/14 Re: [nmh-workers] bug report -- message does not go away Edo (Edoardo Biagioni)
• 2018/05/13 Re: [nmh-workers] bug report -- message does not go away Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/05/12 Re: [nmh-workers] bug report -- message does not go away Edo (Edoardo Biagioni)
• 2018/05/12 Re: [nmh-workers] bug report -- message does not go away Leonardo Taccari
• 2018/05/11 Re: [nmh-workers] bug report -- message does not go away Ken Hornstein
• 2018/05/11 Re: [nmh-workers] bug report -- message does not go away Edo (Edoardo Biagioni)
• 2018/05/11 Re: [nmh-workers] bug report -- message does not go away Edo (Edoardo Biagioni)
• 2018/05/11 Re: [nmh-workers] bug report -- message does not go away Ken Hornstein
• 2018/05/11 Re: [nmh-workers] bug report -- message does not go away Edo (Edoardo Biagioni)
• 2018/05/11 Re: [nmh-workers] bug report -- message does not go away David Levine
• 2018/05/11 [nmh-workers] bug report -- message does not go away Edo (Edoardo Biagioni)
• 2018/05/09 Re: [nmh-workers] [Nmh-workers] Incorporating RSS and Atom feeds Thomas Levine
• 2018/04/26 Re: [nmh-workers] Autocrypt Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/04/26 [nmh-workers] Autocrypt Thomas Levine
• 2018/04/11 Re: [nmh-workers] inc only incorporates one email from spool Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/04/11 Re: [nmh-workers] inc only incorporates one email from spool Robert Elz
• 2018/04/11 Re: [nmh-workers] inc only incorporates one email from spool Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/04/11 [nmh-workers] inc only incorporates one email from spool scrumpyjack
• 2018/04/07 Re: [nmh-workers] Since the (automatic) upgrade to 1.7.1 on CentOS 7.4.1708, send doesn't work David Levine
• 2018/04/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Since the (automatic) upgrade to 1.7.1 on CentOS 7.4.1708, send doesn't work Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/04/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Since the (automatic) upgrade to 1.7.1 on CentOS 7.4.1708, send doesn't work Tom Lane
• 2018/04/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Since the (automatic) upgrade to 1.7.1 on CentOS 7.4.1708, send doesn't work Kevin Layer
• 2018/04/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Since the (automatic) upgrade to 1.7.1 on CentOS 7.4.1708, send doesn't work Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/04/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Since the (automatic) upgrade to 1.7.1 on CentOS 7.4.1708, send doesn't work Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/04/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Since the (automatic) upgrade to 1.7.1 on CentOS 7.4.1708, send doesn't work Ken Hornstein
• 2018/04/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Since the (automatic) upgrade to 1.7.1 on CentOS 7.4.1708, send doesn't work Kevin Layer
• 2018/04/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Since the (automatic) upgrade to 1.7.1 on CentOS 7.4.1708, send doesn't work Ken Hornstein
• 2018/04/02 Re: [nmh-workers] Since the (automatic) upgrade to 1.7.1 on CentOS 7.4.1708, send doesn't work Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/04/02 [nmh-workers] Since the (automatic) upgrade to 1.7.1 on CentOS 7.4.1708, send doesn't work Kevin Layer
• 2018/03/26 Re: [nmh-workers] nmh 1.7.1 for Fedora and RHEL Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/03/26 Re: [nmh-workers] nmh 1.7.1 for Fedora and RHEL Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/03/26 Re: [nmh-workers] nmh 1.7.1 for Fedora and RHEL Jon Steinhart
• 2018/03/26 Re: [nmh-workers] nmh 1.7.1 for Fedora and RHEL David Levine
• 2018/03/25 Re: [nmh-workers] nmh 1.7.1 for Fedora and RHEL Jon Steinhart
• 2018/03/25 [nmh-workers] nmh 1.7.1 for Fedora and RHEL David Levine
• 2018/03/22 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Steffen Nurpmeso
• 2018/03/22 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/03/21 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/03/21 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? valdis . kletnieks
• 2018/03/21 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Steffen Nurpmeso
• 2018/03/21 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Steffen Nurpmeso
• 2018/03/21 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Steffen Nurpmeso
• 2018/03/21 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/03/20 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Bakul Shah
• 2018/03/20 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Paul Vixie
• 2018/03/20 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Paul Fox
• 2018/03/20 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/03/20 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Paul Vixie
• 2018/03/20 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Andy Bradford
• 2018/03/20 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Ken Hornstein
• 2018/03/20 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Bakul Shah
• 2018/03/20 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Steffen Nurpmeso
• 2018/03/20 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Robert Elz
• 2018/03/20 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Steffen Nurpmeso
• 2018/03/20 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/03/20 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Jon Fairbairn
• 2018/03/19 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Robert Elz
• 2018/03/19 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Paul Fox
• 2018/03/19 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Ken Hornstein
• 2018/03/19 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Paul Fox
• 2018/03/19 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Ken Hornstein
• 2018/03/19 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/03/19 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Robert Elz
• 2018/03/18 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Andy Bradford
• 2018/03/18 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Ken Hornstein
• 2018/03/18 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/03/18 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Bakul Shah
• 2018/03/18 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Robert Elz
• 2018/03/18 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? David Levine
• 2018/03/18 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Bakul Shah
• 2018/03/18 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? David Levine
• 2018/03/18 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Andy Bradford
• 2018/03/18 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/03/18 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Ralph Corderoy
• 2018/03/17 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Ken Hornstein
• 2018/03/17 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Paul Fox
• 2018/03/17 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? David Levine
• 2018/03/17 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Ken Hornstein
• 2018/03/17 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Paul Vixie
• 2018/03/17 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? David Levine
• 2018/03/17 Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi??? Ken Hornstein

• Later messages