Ken wrote: > But it turns out that it just appends the message-id to the existing > header without wrapping ... and if you get into a long email thread, that > can exceed the maximum email header limit. This seems like poor behavior.
I think that appending the message-id on a new continuation line would be good enough. It wouldn't repair incoming References header lines that are too long, though. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
