Ken wrote: > Hrm. I thought about that, but it seems like it's slightly suboptimal; > You'd have to deal with a header that would take up a lot of space.
As in more lines? I see 3 or even 4 screenfulls of header fields in typical messages these days, so a few more lines won't matter. > Also, if you want 'nice' formatting, you need something smarter that knows > about the length of the header (like what formataddr does). Really, I > think you could adapt most of the formataddr code, except for splitting at > commas. It may be that my concerns about "nice" header formatting are not > worthwhile. I don't think it's worth the complexity. I don't usually look at References, and the default mhl.headers doesn't cause it to be displayed. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
