Ralph wrote: > I've noticed things like test/fakepop only get built on a > `make check' because that needs to use them. OTOH, it would be nice to > see compilation succeeds along with everything else in the `all' target.
Maybe add a phony target that would build the test programs? Then either specify it manually, along with all, or add it as a dependent of all. I get caught by this, too, so would like to have a solution. > I've been building all, thinking all's OK, edit, make, ..., and then a > check or distcheck shows up problems from earlier edits. Not sure if my > rusty automake is up to this and wondered what opinions were anyway. I'm not sure what that's about. I almost always use build_nmh, and usually with its -s (as part of -dsy or -cdsy), so I start from a clean slate. > docs/historical has a whole tree of old MH source. Whilst useful, I > wonder if that can just be tagged and removed so it doesn't clutter `git > grep', etc., output? I agree with Lyndon and Ken that it's helpful to have it close by. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
