On October 24, 2016 6:37:16 PM GMT+02:00, Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>I dunno, I think we'd need to think carefully if a particular use of >strncpy() really warrants an abort vs a truncate. I mean, just >crapping >out on a really long line that other MUAs handle just fine seems rather >unfriendly to me. What do others think? Copy or die, as the default behavior. Silent truncation should require explicit coding. Strlcpy is completely bogus. Vixie -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
