P Vixie writes: > > > On October 24, 2016 6:37:16 PM GMT+02:00, Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> wrot > e: > > >I dunno, I think we'd need to think carefully if a particular use of > >strncpy() really warrants an abort vs a truncate. I mean, just > >crapping > >out on a really long line that other MUAs handle just fine seems rather > >unfriendly to me. What do others think? > > Copy or die, as the default behavior. > > Silent truncation should require explicit coding. > > Strlcpy is completely bogus.
What's silent about strlcpy? Just check the return value against the size of the buffer. -- Anthony J. Bentley _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
