>What if benign truncations were trunccpy(), instead of the strncpy dance >where the reader is unsure if it's benign or not, and then abortcpy() >could be the strncpy() replacement that aborts on truncation, with all >the previously mentioned get-a-rounds? Obviously, abortcpy is bad and >should be sought and destroyed over time, but meanwhile it puts strncpy >into one of two camps, with the remaining strncpy standing out as still >needing analysis.
Sounds great to me. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
