Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>
> > directly, they supply
> > .B send
> > -with the UNIX pathname of the message draft, and
> > -.B not
> > -a
> > +with the UNIX pathname of the message draft; NOT a
> > .B \-draftmessage
> > .I msg
> > argument. As far as
>
> Must we shout for emphasis? :-)
Oh - you were talking about NOT! lol.
Yes, the use of NOT is well-established - 19 instances. I do think
it's preferable to
.B not
in case some poor soul things not(1) is an nmh command. (It sort
of sounds like one, in fairness.)
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers