>Given all this it makes sense to me to start with the model of >of a separate daemon. I think interfacing nmh commands with mhd >will be much simpler than interfacing with a remote imap server.
Personally, I am not convinced this is true. But, please don't let my concerns stop you! Really, I think at this point any IMAP is better than no IMAP. The only thing I ask is that you please use the "netsec" layer for IMAP network communication; I did all of the hard work of doing the right security stuff in there, and I'd hate to see that work duplicated. >Yes. Any command that can add/delete/move folders and messsages >will have to talk to mhd. But pick, show, scan don't need to.` I ... do not believe that is true. Or I am not understanding your architecture. >At a minimum I want inc working! I've thought about this carefully, and I believe that in an IMAP world you would not use "inc". Or at least you wouldn't use it very often in the normal case. You might be thinking of "refile". --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
