Paul wrote: > as far as i can tell, the -noprint switch to the folder command > is inoperative, since a line of code just below the argument parsing > loop sets the default value of printsw to be non-zero.
Yeah, looks like it's always (at least since 1989/06/26) been that way. I use -f(ast), but it looks like -noprint would be a bit more efficient. > i also see that -noprint isn't documented. perhaps not a coincidence? > > i can fix it, if it seems that i'm reading this right. Sure. David -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
