[email protected] wrote: > On Sat, 06 Jan 2018 00:19:31 +0000, Ralph Corderoy said: > > > That quickly bores. -noprint doesn't seem a good fit for a general > > `please be quiet'. If folder's regaining that functionality then > > perhaps it's the opportunity to use a more general, positive rather than > > negative, option? Especially if it has an often unambiguous > > abbreviation. > > -silent?
i guess i don't think -noprint is so bad. it's pretty much self-explanatory, and has never worked in the past (so we wouldn't be breaking anything). paul =---------------------- paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 0.5 degrees) -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
