ken wrote:
 > Alright, so, question time ... do we want to fix the broken test for 1.7.1?
 > We've already decided, I believe, that iconv will be manitory going forward;
 > the only problem (AFAIK) is that the tests for when we don't have iconv are
 > broken.

i vote for release-noting that support for the absence of iconv is
deprecated, and releasing.  along with a suggestion to the package
maintainers to add a hard dependency on iconv.

paul fox, (arlington, ma, where it's 7.9 degrees)


Reply via email to