ken wrote: > Alright, so, question time ... do we want to fix the broken test for 1.7.1? > We've already decided, I believe, that iconv will be manitory going forward; > the only problem (AFAIK) is that the tests for when we don't have iconv are > broken.
i vote for release-noting that support for the absence of iconv is deprecated, and releasing. along with a suggestion to the package maintainers to add a hard dependency on iconv. paul =---------------------- paul fox, p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 7.9 degrees) -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers