Ralph wrote: > Hi Ken, > > > We've already decided, I believe, that iconv will be manitory going > > forward; > > Don't think David commented?
I agree with Paul F to deprecate support for absence of iconv now and to remove it from next release. Just to note that iconv support is included in GNU glibc. So this change would be (or given its broad support, will be) transparent to package maintainers on Linux platforms, at least. David -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
