Paul F wrote:

> I don't think anyone participating was suggesting that there be a
> hard dependency on vi.

The decision on Fedora was made prior to that discussion.  (And, it
was made on Fedora, not by nmh.)

> (I think under
> debian/ubuntu, the vi dependency would be a "suggested" installation,
> not a requirement.)

I don't know of a good way to do that in a Fedora RPM spec.  I don't
consider mentioning it in the rpm description to be "good".



Reply via email to