Paul F wrote: > I don't think anyone participating was suggesting that there be a > hard dependency on vi.
The decision on Fedora was made prior to that discussion. (And, it was made on Fedora, not by nmh.) > (I think under > debian/ubuntu, the vi dependency would be a "suggested" installation, > not a requirement.) I don't know of a good way to do that in a Fedora RPM spec. I don't consider mentioning it in the rpm description to be "good". David -- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
