Paul F wrote:
> I don't think anyone participating was suggesting that there be a
> hard dependency on vi.
The decision on Fedora was made prior to that discussion. (And, it
was made on Fedora, not by nmh.)
> (I think under
> debian/ubuntu, the vi dependency would be a "suggested" installation,
> not a requirement.)
I don't know of a good way to do that in a Fedora RPM spec. I don't
consider mentioning it in the rpm description to be "good".