Ken Hornstein <k...@pobox.com> writes: > My larger point is that, sadly, I've seen a distressing number of times > when the text/plain version of a multipart/alternative message is not > useful. I really wish people who have a shitty text/plain part would > simply NOT bother and just generate text/html; I don't know why they > even bother to generate such a lousy text/plain part, but this is the > world we live in. I suspect we (nmh users) might be the only users who > actually look at the text/plain content versus the text/html content.
Sadly true. I have even seen a text/plain part of an event announcement that was for the previous event! The mind boggles as to what kind of software could cause that to happen. -- Jón Fairbairn jon.fairba...@cl.cam.ac.uk -- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers