Ken Hornstein <> writes:

> My larger point is that, sadly, I've seen a distressing number of times
> when the text/plain version of a multipart/alternative message is not
> useful.  I really wish people who have a shitty text/plain part would
> simply NOT bother and just generate text/html; I don't know why they
> even bother to generate such a lousy text/plain part, but this is the
> world we live in.  I suspect we (nmh users) might be the only users who
> actually look at the text/plain content versus the text/html content.

Sadly true.  I have even seen a text/plain part of an event
announcement that was for the previous event! The mind boggles
as to what kind of software could cause that to happen.

Jón Fairbairn                       


Reply via email to