Hi Ken,
> > Shouldn't he drop the -format in this case?
>
> Yeah, probably. Although ... that's not wonderful either. I'm open
> to ideas of how we could we could do this better.
Yes, I see what you mean. That forwards the whole email as the body of
a new one.
What Arthur's really after is storing the part of the email that's
interesting, and then having it as the MIME attachment, possibly the
only one, of a new email to send. With the Subject field being carried
across too.
We've noted before how 42 refers to email 42, but 42.2 doesn't mean
part 2, nor 42.text/html all its text/html parts.
forw -mime 42.text/html
--
Cheers, Ralph.
