Hi Paul, > it became clear that the range compression was an impediment. Now > that I've added the ability to explicitly ask "is message 4 part of > sequence foo", range compression isn't really an issue, but it feels > like we should be able to control it. I'd kind of like to add > -terse/-noterse:
-range/-norange. :-) > (I'd also love to fix the old bug that causes "9 10" to be displayed as > "9-10", but I probably shouldn't. Someone probably relies on it.) I wasn't aware it was a bug, more an easy way to spot singletons; messages without an adjacent neighbour in the sequence. -- Cheers, Ralph.
