>> Maybe shrink/noshrink? > >I prefer [no]range. It seems to me to be the most relevant and specific.
I find myself ultimately persuaded by Ralph's argument, so also put me down for [no]range. --Ken
>> Maybe shrink/noshrink? > >I prefer [no]range. It seems to me to be the most relevant and specific.
I find myself ultimately persuaded by Ralph's argument, so also put me down for [no]range. --Ken