Ken Hornstein writes: > >> Brilliant idea! I too would use an inverse match logic. Shorter rules, > >> easier to apply, probably faster. > >> > >> G > > > >I guess that I should interpret that as no, there isn't such an incantation > >but since I brought it up then it's my job to write the code so I will when > >I get a chance. > > You don't need to write anything. From mhl(1): > > The component "Extras" will output all of the components of the message > which were not matched by explicit components, or included in the > ignore list. If this component is not specified, an ignore list is not > needed since all non-specified components will be ignored. > > So just remove "extras". > > --Ken
Ah, thanks.