Dear Jules,
You are correct in pointing out where the problem lies.
However, the covariance matrix is not fine since it is at the boundary just as 
much as the translation into correlation.
Correlation is calculated by this equation:
Cor(eta1,eta2)=OM1,2 /(sqrt(OM1,1)*sqrt(OM2,2))
Where:
OM1,1 and OM2,2, represents eta variance (as reported by nonmem output in the 
OMEGA cov matrix, i.e. on var scale and not the sd scale that is reported in 
the OMEGA corr matrix) and
OM1,2 represents Cov(eta1,eta2), i.e. as reported for the off diagonal on the 
OMEGA cov matrix

I did not check your control stream thoroughly, but apparently, with the 
current data and model baseline (E0) and Emax are completely correlated on the 
individual level, maybe because of lack of information, maybe because of 
physiology – you currently have an additive effect, but maybe Emax would be 
bringing the PD endpoint all the way to zero or reducing the endpoint by a 
certain fraction (i.e. a multiplicative model), or maybe healthy can not be 
reduced at all, wheras elevated values can be reduced (almost) down to healthy 
values? If you get that “structural” part of your drug-effects model right, you 
may then be able to estimate correlation (or conclude with the new structure 
these two etas are no longer correlated).
Best regards

Jakob
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Jules Heuberger
Sent: 17 September 2013 11:42
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NMusers] OMEGA - CORR MATRIX FOR RANDOM EFFECTS - ETAS

Dear NM Users,

I ran into a problem with a NM 7.2 run with an OMEGA BLOCK (2), receiving an 
error message saying the parameter estimate is near its boundary (See also the 
discussion in [NMusers] How to solve it? ERROR: PARAMETER ESTIMATE IS NEAR ITS 
BOUNDARY ). After digging through the documentation I am still unsure where the 
problem is originating from. What I figured out is that the problem lies in the 
OMEGA - CORR MATRIX FOR RANDOM EFFECTS - ETAS  *******, a matrix I believe is 
only introduced since NM7.2. The estimate in this matrix that is giving 
problems is the one for the OMEGA BLOCK, which is estimated to be 1 (a 
boundary).

Now, as far as I know, the OMEGA - CORR MATRIX is related to the OMEGA - COV 
MATRIX as the sqrt of its estimate. However, it is unclear to me how the OMEGA 
BLOCK estimate (COV MATRIX), which gives the correlation between the two ETAs, 
is related to the OMEGA - CORR MATRIX value. What does this value actually 
mean, and what does it mean for my error message, as the correlation estimate 
itself seems to be fine? In the print below you can see the model and resulting 
estimates, the important ones being 5.26E-02 (OMEGA - COV MATRIX of ETA1-ETA2) 
and 1.00E+00 (OMEGA - CORR MATRIX of ETA1-ETA2). The model has two ETAs and an 
proportional error model,

Thanks in advance for any insights and help,

Best,

Jules Heuberger


Reply via email to