On Dec 8, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Bryan wrote: > I'm disappointed that my banks do not support this feature, since it > was my most-anticipated new feature in 1.4 : ( > > I've written to both institutions asking them to support direct > downloads. Is that the correct way to refer to the feature? I can > access my banks through the web and download quicken files and import > them manually into MW, but this direct download requires additional > technology, correct? > > Can you tell me the correct technical way to refer to the needed > feature so that I can clearly let my bank know what I would like them > to offer? > Bryan,
Most banks understand "direct connect downloads" or "Quicken direct connect." Very few know what it means to have an OFX server, but that's actually what is required. It's an additional cost for banks and many hate additional costs that they can't make money off of easily. > I will say that I appreciate the listing of the "update similar > transactions." This allows me to "see" what I'm doing so I'm much > more comfortable letting MW clean up my transactions when I can > approve each individual change. > > I have to be honest and say that I liked the old icons better. These > are just way too small. The old ones were much easier to understand > and they just looked nicer. Both sets of icons were 32 pixels square so the size really shouldn't be different. Give them a chance, I think they'll grow on you. Peace, Kevin Hoctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] No Thirst Software LLC http://nothirst.com http://kevinhoctor.blogspot.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "No Thirst Software User Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/no-thirst-software?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
