I've noticed that a deposit directly into an expense bucket is treated as a positive value in the expense portion of the graph, rather than positive in income. This makes sense, but on the other hand, I kind of think of a deposit into an expense bucket as just a shortcut for a deposit into an income bucket and subsequent cash flow from income into that expense bucket.. but when you do it that way, it shows up as income :)
Arguably, it's correct as is, but it's weird seeing a positive expense number pulling the expense portion of the graph down below the line, since thats where positive is, and I could see someone getting confused by this at first. -- Chris Larson clarson at kergoth dot com clarson at mvista dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Software Engineer MontaVista Software, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "No Thirst Software User Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/no-thirst-software?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
