On Dec 18, 2008, at 3:40 PM, Christopher Larson wrote: > I've noticed that a deposit directly into an expense bucket is treated > as a positive value in the expense portion of the graph, rather than > positive in income. This makes sense, but on the other hand, I kind > of think of a deposit into an expense bucket as just a shortcut for a > deposit into an income bucket and subsequent cash flow from income > into that expense bucket.. but when you do it that way, it shows up as > income :) > Yes, because it's in an "income" bucket. ;) See how that fits so nicely?
> Arguably, it's correct as is, but it's weird seeing a positive expense > number pulling the expense portion of the graph down below the line, > since thats where positive is, and I could see someone getting > confused by this at first. Seriously, I spent a lot of time going back and forth on this but came to the conclusion that unassigned deposits are treated like income but a deposit specifically assigned to an expense bucket is an expense, just as a reversal (like a return or a rebate). This way, the user has the option to have it treated either way. Peace, Kevin Hoctor [email protected] No Thirst Software LLC http://nothirst.com http://kevinhoctor.blogspot.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "No Thirst Software User Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/no-thirst-software?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
