Adding others who have commented on cim previously. On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:10 -0500, Mike Burns wrote: > Based on discussions with various people, we decided to go forward with > sblim-sfcb over tog-pegasus as the cim provider in ovirt-node. I'm > working on setting the patches to add this support to ovirt-node and > I've already hit the first issue. > > libvirt-cim requires tog-pegasus. Is this actually a hard requirement? > Can this be changed to some generic "Requires cim" that both tog-pegasus > and sblim-sfcb could provide? If not, are there any issues with us > blacklisting tog-pegasus? > > Thanks > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > node-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/node-devel
_______________________________________________ node-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/node-devel
