On 02/29/2012 07:27 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 04:17:43PM -0500, Mike Burns wrote:
Adding others who have commented on cim previously.
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:10 -0500, Mike Burns wrote:
Based on discussions with various people, we decided to go forward with
sblim-sfcb over tog-pegasus as the cim provider in ovirt-node. I'm
working on setting the patches to add this support to ovirt-node and
I've already hit the first issue.
libvirt-cim requires tog-pegasus. Is this actually a hard requirement?
Can this be changed to some generic "Requires cim" that both tog-pegasus
and sblim-sfcb could provide? If not, are there any issues with us
blacklisting tog-pegasus?
I'm pretty sure I heard/read Chip say in the past that they used sblim
in regression testing :-) I think the Require is the result of RHEL
packaging where tog-pegasus was the only one present. Also I don't
know (but might exist) any construct allowing
You're correct that libvirt-cim should work with SFCB, but it's been quite a
while since any real testing has been done with it since almost all of our
clients today use tog-pegasus. It's safe to assume there will be some bugs
integrating the latest libvirt-cim with the latest SFCB CIMOM.
Requires: tog-pegasus or sblim-sfcb
as you said the only way in rpm is to define a generic provide
(maybe more specific than just 'cim' what about 'cim-server') then
Requires: cim-server
in the libvirt-cim and add the Provides: cim-server in all server
packages. The only problem with that is that we ultimately need to
"fix" all packages.
The first thing would be to make bug requests against tog-pegasus
sblim-sfcb to have that added. Unfortunately I don't think we can
get this in RHEL-6.3 at this point...
Daniel
--
Chip Vincent
Open Virtualization
IBM Linux Technology Center
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
node-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/node-devel
