Am Montag, den 31.03.2014, 05:16 -0400 schrieb Barak Azulay: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Fabian Deutsch" <[email protected]> > > To: "Barak Azulay" <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected], "Douglas Landgraf" <[email protected]>, "node-devel" > > <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 10:46:01 AM > > Subject: Re: [node-devel] Versioning of oVirt Node > > > > Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2014, 05:51 -0400 schrieb Barak Azulay: > > > > Should we also consider parallel versions of different > > > distributions(?) > > > > (fc19, fc20). > > > > > > Doesn't this miss the entire node purpose ? a user should not care > > > what platform was used to build the node. > > > > As said elsewhere. For some users the base-os is important to know. > > Any idea why ? > > The only thing I can think off is that we are probably doing something wrong.
Some people just want to use CentOS, others favor Fedora. I believe partially it's just a personal preference. OTOH it is surely the case that el6 is slower moving then Fedora, and thus it is more stable. I'd also say that this is true for the el6 based Node. We keep the Fedora based Node around - or bring it back - to have a platform to develop on. - fabian > > > > - fabian > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Arch mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ node-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/node-devel
