Am Montag, den 31.03.2014, 07:57 -0400 schrieb Alon Bar-Lev: > > > > > > I don't mind moving to our own tiny distro as long as it's a > single > > > image to release and maintain > > > > Well, Node _is_ actually a tiny distro, just based on some package > based > > on some existing one. > > I do not think that it is tiny distro... but let's not get into this > argument :)
Hehe ;) > > > > > The effort of maintaining multiple ovirt-nodes based on distro and > > > distro-version and ovirt-version creates an unmanageable test > matrix > > > that all the community might loose from > > > > I partially agree here. > > From my POV the Fedora based Node is very useful for us to develop > Node, > > sooner or later the changes we've got in Fedora will land in CentOS, > > thus devleoping on Fedora is a preparation for being able to deliver > a > > (stable) CentOS based Node. > > > > So IMO we should continue to develop on Fedora, but we might want to > > consider to keep to only deliver the CentOS based Node. > > The Fedora based build could be seen as nightlies. > > If we consider single base distribution (aka blackbox which is not > black at all...), and you agree that centos is a fit, I do not see any > reason to invest resources in fedora. In the light of man power it makes sense to only support one Node - (as in delivering releases and providing support) which we currently do. From the development point of view, we should continue to develop features on Fedora. - fabian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ node-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/node-devel
