+1 On Tuesday, 10 April 2012 08:45:38 UTC-5, Eldar wrote: > > For me github is awesome. Generaly 5-10 minutes of digging through the > code is enough do decide whether you like it or not and if you like it you > don't care so much about popularity, battle testing and other boring stuff. > You just confident. Otherwise when code is bad no matter how many forks and > watchers and dependents project has you are still not happy and looking for > something else. Popularity is not a measure. I know few popular modules but > it whould be probably better if they never been published. > > it perpetuates modules that are created by people with more visibility >> > > Such people centric approach when you know not only module but also a > person who wrote it is awesome. Next time when new module comes in you just > know what to expect, how it will be maintained... > > As a conclusion: > I am happy with github, I think nipster <http://eirikb.github.com/nipster> is > a right direction. The only thing I'd like to call community to is to* be > responsible while pushing new module to the npm, be confident that it will > add a value*. There is no need for some kind of approval process and so > on, it's not bad if someone accidentally overrates it's module. Just a Will > is enought. It's a question of culture and culture can be cultivated. > > >>
-- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
