[Reposting since my last reply disappeared] My take on this:
I wouldn't see it in terms of a "threat". I'd rather think of it as spreading the async word further into the JVM ecosystem. That's a good thing for everyone. Vert.x is broader than node but clearly node is a source of inspiration. Vert.x would probably not exist if it wasn't for node. I see Vert.x competing more with the likes of Akka/Play than node, but if Vert.x gets some users from the node community because it fulfils their needs better, that's not a bad thing either. On Thursday, May 10, 2012 2:32:39 AM UTC+1, Node42 wrote: > > <a href=" > http://vertxproject.wordpress.com/2012/05/09/vert-x-vs-node-js-simple-http-benchmarks/";>Benchmark > > </a> > > <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3948727";>Hacker News > Discussion</a> > > <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3927891";>Hacker News > Discussion 2</a> > > <a href="http://vertx.io/";>Vert.x</a> > > <a href="http://www.infoq.com/news/2012/05/vertx";>InforQ article</a> > > <a href=" > http://fbflex.wordpress.com/2012/05/02/running-vert-x-applications-on-heroku/";>Running > > Vert.x Applications on Heroku</a> > -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
