There's no test runner for all frameworks.

That would be a great idea though but it's very unlikely that someone
reaches a compromise between features that is acceptable for different test
framework developers.

Nuno

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 2:43 AM, Dominic Tarr <[email protected]>wrote:

> _everyone_ a strong opinion on this.
>
> our test frameworks need to be rewritten now that we have domains.
>
> maybe, write through exercises in the book?
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Roly Fentanes <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If you can get your tests' point across clearly by using node's `assert`
> > module and it's not that much difficult to structure compared to a full
> > featured test framework, then consider using it.
> >
> > Otherwise, mocha is the popular recent one, and my personal choice.
> nodeunit
> > is easy to understand too, and has been around for a while. vows used to
> be
> > the choice, there's still a lot of popular modules with their tests
> written
> > with vows. But it's no longer maintained and it shows.
> >
> > chai is often used along with these to make assertions easier to
> understand.
> >
> >
> > On Monday, July 16, 2012 9:56:14 AM UTC-7, Alex Young wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I write about Node a lot, and I often illustrate concepts using tests.
> >> However, there isn't a standard test runner for Node.
> >>
> >> So, let's say I'm writing a book about Node.  I'd like to include
> examples
> >> using a test runner that's idiomatic, lightweight, and likely to be
> around
> >> in a year or two.  I'm thinking Mocha or Nodeunit might be a good idea.
> >>
> >> My projects from 2010-2011 seemed to use Nodeunit, and I've switched a
> few
> >> to Mocha with very little trouble.  Their APIs aren't directly
> compatible
> >> but the same concepts can be readily gleaned in both.
> >>
> >> Does anyone have any strong opinions about this? What test runner would
> >> you expect (or want) to see in books about Node?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Alex
> >
> > --
> > Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
> > Posting guidelines:
> > https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "nodejs" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
>
> --
> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
> Posting guidelines:
> https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "nodejs" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
>

-- 
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: 
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

Reply via email to