Jorge doesn't have to swallow anything. In fact he has not. He has engaged with 
the subject at hand and has not responded to the troll bait about his lib. 
Notice he continues to receive feedback, about the subject. As does rektide 
even though he was the person who derailed the conversation in the first place.

You however, chose to respond to the bait by throwing a tantrum and calling the 
whole community childish and unprofessional (** groan **). Even though it looks 
like the comment that set you off from rektide, who brought up TAGG in the 
first place.

So as desperately hard as you're trying to have a rational discussion about 
this, you seem to be the only person who can't seem to do so. And at this 
point, responding to you is starting to feel dangerously like feeding trolls... 
oh damn. Guess I fell for it too.

:Marco

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 17, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Bruno Jouhier <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> So it is perfectly fine if someone writes:
> 
> "Threads-a-go-go is a pretty daft silly thing. 
> It's certainly not the safe sane shared-nothing threading that keeps Node & 
> JS safe. That 
> responsible multi-threading work was attempted in the 'isolates' branch of 
> Node.js"
> 
> Jorge should just swallow the FUD, bend over and apologize for having 
> proposed such a "daft silly thing" to the community! 
> 
> BTW, the 'isolates' branch failed, probably because it was trying to do too 
> much (put a complete node into every isolate). TAGG solves a much narrower 
> problem: delegating CPU intensive operations to threads, and it does it in a 
> safe and efficient way.
> 
> The problem is that we cannot even discuss anything related to threads in a 
> rational way. There may be perfectly valid use cases for threads in node (I 
> think that CPU intensive computations are one - you can do them in threads 
> with C++, why not in JS?), and there are perfectly safe and clean ways to add 
> threads to node (and I think that TAGG is one - the "eval" situation can be 
> improved with modules). But how can we discuss this without everyone jumping 
> to the ceiling?
> 
> Bruno
> -- 
> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
> Posting guidelines: 
> https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "nodejs" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

-- 
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: 
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

Reply via email to