Node.js modules are supposed to use semver, and although I found that 
nobody really cares about putting incompatible changes in minor version, I 
wonder how it is supposed to be done right.

So, there is a question. What semver versions should be used when a certain 
library reaches 1.x.x version, but needs to fall back into initial 
development stage again?

I'm talking about a development model similar to node.js core, when two 
branches are maintained, stable and unstable one, and no guarantees are 
provided for an unstable.

Should it be something like this?:
1.0.0 1.0.1 ... 1.5.0 ... 2.0.0-pre1 2.0.0-pre2 ... 2.0.0-pre4096 ... 2.0.0 
2.0.1 ...

Is there a way out of browser versioning if such an iteration is just a few 
months long? :)  Yeah, I've read the FAQ, and it isn't extremely convincing.

-- 
-- 
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: 
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nodejs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to