On 06/07/2016 08:23 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 06/03/2016 09:39 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 05/31/2016 09:56 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>> As indicated in previous emails, my new $DAYJOB responsibilities are leaving >>> little time to spend on Node.js maintenance work. I'm happy to hang around >>> and >>> serve as a comaintainer, but primary maintainership in Fedora should really >>> be >>> picked up by someone who can dedicate more time to it. >>> >>> Volunteers? >>> >>> As an aside, Patches (T.C. Hollingsworth) is still listed as the primary >>> maintainer, but he's been non-responsive for over a year now; we should >>> probably >>> request that FESCo orphan it so we can invest group::nodejs-sig as the >>> official >>> owner. >>> >>> >> >> Node.js 6.2.1 is out today. Who wants to volunteer to pull it in? I'll be >> around >> on #fedora-devel to assist if there is any trouble. >> > > > Folks, it's been four days and no one has stepped up to package Node.js 6.2.1. > This is a problem since it *is* a security patch... >
Sorry, forgot to include the link to the security BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343395 > > > Also, we need to start talking about plans for moving EPEL away from 0.10.x. > That release is only going to be supported for a few more months upstream[1] > until 2016-10-01. We should probably look at putting 6.2.1 in the epel-testing > repo of those branches for a few months and announcing the move widely. > > [1] https://github.com/nodejs/LTS#lts_schedule > > > > _______________________________________________ > nodejs mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected] >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ nodejs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
