On 29/08/2019 20:01, Ben Rosser wrote:

Hm, does it make sense then to have a compatibility package for lodash3?

I think we may have to multiversion it yes. Been thinking that for
a while.

I'll try and have a look at doing a lodash4 version of the spec
over the weekend...

dnf repoquery --whatrequires nodejs-lodash says:

You need to look at all the nodejs-lodash-xxx modules as well which
are built from the same source, although they don't make as much
difference as I expected. That and BRs which I haven't looked at.

My guess is also that at least *some* of these packages have a newer
release which support lodash 4 but no one has updated the package,
whether because the package is effectively unmaintained or the
maintainer is overworked or worried about breaking dependencies. :(

Oh probably quite a lot do, it's been a bit chicken and egg having
to try and do everything at once, or even audit what is actually
doable - ie what dependants have a new version with support.

For instance, looking at the last package on this list... the current
version of zip-stream is 2.1.2 and does not actually require lodash at
all anymore.

https://github.com/archiverjs/node-zip-stream/blob/master/package.json

Somebody should update it then ;-)

Tom

--
Tom Hughes ([email protected])
http://compton.nu/
_______________________________________________
nodejs mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to