On 29/08/2019 20:01, Ben Rosser wrote:
Hm, does it make sense then to have a compatibility package for lodash3?
I think we may have to multiversion it yes. Been thinking that for a while. I'll try and have a look at doing a lodash4 version of the spec over the weekend...
dnf repoquery --whatrequires nodejs-lodash says:
You need to look at all the nodejs-lodash-xxx modules as well which are built from the same source, although they don't make as much difference as I expected. That and BRs which I haven't looked at.
My guess is also that at least *some* of these packages have a newer release which support lodash 4 but no one has updated the package, whether because the package is effectively unmaintained or the maintainer is overworked or worried about breaking dependencies. :(
Oh probably quite a lot do, it's been a bit chicken and egg having to try and do everything at once, or even audit what is actually doable - ie what dependants have a new version with support.
For instance, looking at the last package on this list... the current version of zip-stream is 2.1.2 and does not actually require lodash at all anymore. https://github.com/archiverjs/node-zip-stream/blob/master/package.json
Somebody should update it then ;-) Tom -- Tom Hughes ([email protected]) http://compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ nodejs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
