Hi! I'm one of the maintainers of Grafana in Fedora.
> Not that the tests would go away, but that the build/test dependencies would > be bundled in a tarball. I really like the idea, however (using latest Grafana): $ du -sch node_modules 1,7G node_modules Some of the largest dependencies: $ du -am node_modules | sort -n -r | head -n 20 1719 node_modules 291 node_modules/@storybook 85 node_modules/@babel 81 node_modules/@storybook/core 78 node_modules/@storybook/core/node_modules 73 node_modules/monaco-editor 66 node_modules/@types 58 node_modules/@microsoft 54 node_modules/@microsoft/api-extractor 53 node_modules/typescript 52 node_modules/@microsoft/api-extractor/node_modules 50 node_modules/typescript/lib 49 node_modules/@microsoft/api-extractor/node_modules/typescript 46 node_modules/@microsoft/api-extractor/node_modules/typescript/lib 38 node_modules/@svgr 36 node_modules/@svgr/webpack/node_modules 36 node_modules/@svgr/webpack 35 node_modules/@svgr/webpack/node_modules/@babel 33 node_modules/monaco-editor/dev/vs 33 node_modules/monaco-editor/dev $ ls node_modules | wc -l 2017 Compressing the node_modules folder using zstd: default level: 179 MB zstd level 19: 108 MB How can/should we bundle that? Is this size acceptable in a SRPM? Bundling it would allow us to build the frontend and run the frontend tests as part of the spec, and we can apply patches properly (without (re)generating anything locally). Most of the patches at least, in case some security patch requires an upgrade of a npm dependency, we also need to recreate the vendor tarball. Cheers, Andreas _______________________________________________ nodejs mailing list -- nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to nodejs-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
