I think you had to have less than a .400 winning % to be involved...your team was at .444 lasdt season, so this would not have included your team................... ---- Robert Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please check into this situation. Were the new owners, one which is me ( > PENN) involved in any way with what is referred to as the "stink draft". > > Would we have been hurt by not being included > I have no way of knowing but > if thsi would have helped the new teams something should be offered as > compensation. > > > > Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 14:35:27 -0500 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: NOMBL Draft > > CC: [email protected] > > > > Since the "Stink Draft" is over, and the 2012 Draft has begun, I think the > > only fair and ethical thing to do with the teams being over in players + > > draft picks is the team must cut it's draft picks down to the 41 total. > > If any players are cut, it would be wrong as these players should have been > > available in the stink draft. > > We all had ample time, several times, to make the appropriate cuts to equal > > 41 total players. > > > > This is the fair, correct and ethical thing to > > do..........................Lou.....Chesapeake.................... > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "NOMBL" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NOMBL" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.
