im taking a break from studying cells to do something I enjoy being strato so I made a list of all the ballparks current and available. The names that say wrong are listed that way because the website is currently incorrect and needs to be updated. My suggestion is to fix the too many players thing and then restart the regular draft back up and then do the ballpark draft later. It seems beneficial to everyone to draft parks after the 2012 season comes out (which is in about a week) so we all know what the dimensions of our parks look like. I don't see any reason why we have to do the park draft before the regular draft. I don't think that many teams if any are going to change anyways. Well that's my opinion. Back to 3 more years of the exciting nucleus.Brandt
Team Stadium Brooklyn Oakland McAfee Stadium Buffalo STL Busch Chesapeake NYA Yankee Stadium Des Moines Milwaukee Miller Park Dublin Arizona Chase Field wrong Fiji Houston Minute Maid Park Geneva CHN WrigleyField Howard Washington Nationals Park Las Vegas Boston Fenway Newton Philadelphia Citizens Bank Norfolk Florida Sun Life Stadium wrong North Bay Cincinnati Great American wrong Oakland SF Pac Bell Pennsylvania Cleveland Progressive Portsmouth NYN Citi Fields Rapid City Seattle Safeco Suffolk KC Kauffman Tidewater Baltimore Camden Yards wrong Tracy LAN Dodger stadium Virginia Texas Ameriquest Field Open Toronto Rogers Center Tampa Bay Tropicana Minnesota Target CHA US Cellular LAA Angels Stadium Pittsburgh PNC Park Detroit Comerica Park Colorado Coors Atlanta Turner San Diego Petco From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: stink draft thoughts Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 12:17:04 -0800 btw a little off topic here: i have always thought that the i stink draft should be open to all teams to be fare to everyone. But the players available to be picked up should change- something like you can only pick up players with 40ip+ for RP and 80ip for SP and 200PA or something like that. Right now the perimeters for the draft dont really require you to draft for innings which is the point of the draft. I like the idea of giving a 2-3 round predraft of dropped players to help all teams with usage. This still caters to the teams at the bottom as they still get to go first and I honestly dont see too many upper tier teams picking up players. Something to think about next year. Brandt From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: RE: NOMBL Draft Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 12:06:37 -0800 I think teams that are over should have a chance at trading to get there team rosters + picks back to 41. As for teams not able to pick up players in the i stink draft. It is what it is. Mistakes happen and you can't really go back and fix it. I have never been a big fan of the stink draft anyways. When I first got my team in this league I was struggling to draft players to cover innings. Since i was not included in the i stink draft because of my record i had to draft those players in the regular draft which put me at a disadvantage. We should give a small window to get these errors fixed by trade or dropping players and if they are not fixed then just cut there lowest draft picks automatically. > Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 14:35:27 -0500 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: NOMBL Draft > CC: [email protected] > > Since the "Stink Draft" is over, and the 2012 Draft has begun, I think the > only fair and ethical thing to do with the teams being over in players + > draft picks is the team must cut it's draft picks down to the 41 total. > If any players are cut, it would be wrong as these players should have been > available in the stink draft. > We all had ample time, several times, to make the appropriate cuts to equal > 41 total players. > > This is the fair, correct and ethical thing to > do..........................Lou.....Chesapeake.................... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "NOMBL" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NOMBL" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NOMBL" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NOMBL" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.
