no nattering nabobs of negativity should go right at the top of the
constitution. Good stuff. From: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 16:54:42 -0500
Subject: Re: stink draft thoughts
To: [email protected]
Good ideas folks. One of the things i like about the
Flory site is that it lets us see other league constitutions. There's a lot
of good stuff in there. We have one of the better setups and all we need is a
little tweaking here and there. Jack, Brandt,John Lou, and of course Robert
have been quite helpful to me personally and i respect their
opinions. In my three years in NOMBL, i have seen it grow from about a
dozen or so conscientious owners and a few disinterested owners mixed
in with some nattering nabobs of negativity to.. dare i say
twenty competitive and fair minded players. The new owners will find that
it may take a while but much more often than not things work out for the
best.
In between the end of our season
and the start of our draft maybe we could submit our suggestions
and Robert or a panel of owners could have them brought forward for
discussion then put to a vote and if approved be effective the
following season.
thanks and stay sharp,
Blaine
In a message dated 2/5/2012 3:17:06 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
btw a little off topic here: i have always thought that the i
stink draft should be open to all teams to be fare to everyone. But the
players available to be picked up should change- something like you can only
pick up players with 40ip+ for RP and 80ip for SP and 200PA or
something like that. Right now the perimeters for the draft dont really
require you to draft for innings which is the point of the draft. I like the
idea of giving a 2-3 round predraft of dropped players to help all teams
with usage. This still caters to the teams at the bottom as they still get to
go first and I honestly dont see too many upper tier teams picking up
players.
Something to think about next year.
Brandt
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: NOMBL
Draft
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 12:06:37 -0800
I think teams that are over should have a chance at trading to
get there team rosters + picks back to 41.
As for
teams not able to pick up players in the i stink draft. It is what it is.
Mistakes happen and you can't really go back and fix it. I have never been a
big fan of the stink draft anyways. When I first got my team in this
league I was struggling to draft players to cover innings. Since i
was not included in the i stink draft because of my record i had to draft
those players in the regular draft which put me at a
disadvantage.
We should give a small window to get these
errors fixed by trade or dropping players and if they are not fixed then just
cut there lowest draft picks automatically.
> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 14:35:27
-0500
> From: [email protected]
> To:
[email protected]
> Subject: RE: NOMBL Draft
> CC:
[email protected]
>
> Since the "Stink Draft" is over, and the
2012 Draft has begun, I think the only fair and ethical thing to do with the
teams being over in players + draft picks is the team must cut it's draft
picks down to the 41 total.
> If any players are cut, it would be wrong
as these players should have been available in the stink draft.
> We all
had ample time, several times, to make the appropriate cuts to equal 41 total
players.
>
> This is the fair, correct and ethical thing to
do..........................Lou.....Chesapeake....................
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to
the Google Groups "NOMBL" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
> For more options, visit this group
at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.
