Can you please clarify?
The announcement is at
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/archives/linux-audio-announce/2020-June/002820.html
Where is it implied that non-session-manager is malware?
I do realize your name was not in that announcement.
This was not intentional.
I am sorry for that, you absolutely and clearly deserve credit for NSM.
On 04/01/21 00:29, J. Liles wrote:
Indeed. In the LAA announcement post he implied that
non-session-manager malware as well.
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 4:22 PM Marc Lavallée <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I did not know about New Session Manager, only a bit about Non.
Now I'm reading this page:
https://linuxaudio.github.io/new-session-manager/
The description looks like Non is almost a proprietary software,
and that New is trying to "fix that" as a "community version". Non
is released as a GPL2 software, so clearly there was no need to
fork it as a "community version". It there's a better reason (that
could be mentioned)?
GPL2 does not mean "free lunch"; there's other licenses for that.
Marc
Le 21-01-03 à 19 h 08, Filipe Coelho a écrit :
On 03/01/21 23:57, rosea.grammostola wrote:
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Monday, January 4, 2021 12:47 AM, Filipe Coelho
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
1. the new-session-manager fork was done by Nils, not me. I
appreciated the effort and contributed some little things
afterwards.
The idea for a fork was yours Filipe. You're fully responsible
for it, together with Nils. There is no point in denying or
downplaying your role.
Huh? Where did you get this from?
I approved the idea of a fork, yes. Not sure if I was the first
one to suggest it, I am pretty sure a bunch of people thought
about it too.
I did say that I would maintain the "old" GUI if needed, you can
point the finger at me for that.
But wait, just because I have an idea for something, how does it
make me responsible for it?
It would not have happened if others did not have interest on it.
Stop making it all on me.
Thanks