----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roland Hechtenberg" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: propriety


>
> Mark Spahn schrieb:
> (Sorry about the earlier empty answer, wrong button.)
>> Please be serious.  I have asked repeatedly what, specifically, the
>> objection is,
>> and the objectors remain silent.
>
> I do believe that you have been asked repeatedly not to post private
> mail you have with someone on another list on this list.
> Which part of "not post private mail on this list" do you not understand?

Roland, Thank you, thank you for finally addressing these terms.

I understand "not".  I do not understand "post".  I think it
means to send an e-mail message to one or more destinations,
but I am not sure.  I do not understand "private" in this context;
please define it.  I understand "mail" to be in contrast to "e-mail".
Mail is sent on paper, e-mail via computer communication.
But does the English word "mail" also mean ???, which in
English is called "e-mail"?  I understand "this list" to mean
the list not_honyaku.  (What exactly a "list" is in this context
is not something I am confident in explaining.)

>> None of
>> these six people have explained what they mean by "cross-posting", or why
>> they don't like it.
>
> Cross-posting is posting messages from another list on a different lsit,
> in this case, posting your messages to Irfan on non_honyaku, where Irfan
> is not a member.

This I do not understand.  My messages to Irfan were not from a list
at all.  *I* originated them.  And Irfan is not on a list either; he wrote 
from
his company address.  Irfan didn't post to not_honyaku, and even if
he did, he would not be cross-posting, as you have defined
cross-posting.  Is membership part of the definition of cross-posting?


>>  I have explained my understanding of "posting" and
>> "cross-posting", and asked for clarification, to be met with silence.
>>
>
> Again, so that you can no longer feign ignorance: You posting your
> messages to Irfan and his answers on not_honyaku is considered to be
> cross-posting, impolite, obnoxious, improper, and definitely undesirable
> by many members of this list.
>
No, as you have explained it, posting my messages to Irfan (anywhere)
is not cross-posting; these are not messages from a list.
Cross-posting is not bad, is it?  What, exactly, is impolite, and
to whom?  You can't mean Irfan's speech to me, or my speech
to him, which I think has been decorous.
My conversation with Irfan has been conducted in exactly the
same way as my much earlier conversation with a Scientology
official.  No one objected to that, and the term "cross-posting"
never came up.  What is different now?

>> Similarly, I wonder what of my "private" messages got to this public 
>> forum,
>> but no one has quoted a passage from them that I can verify was not 
>> intended
>> to appear here.
>>
>
> Anything you wrote to Irfan and everything he answered you is considered
> to be your private messages, and no quoting should be required.

So I cannot quote to you my own words to someone else?
How am I to convey to you what I said to him, and he to me?
If they're my private messages, I ought to be able to
convey them to anyone I please.  Right?

>> For the third time, I ask you to quote my  words to Irfan that you
>> find improper, and why you find them so.  I hope this third prod will be 
>> the
>> charm.
>>
>
> Everything you wrote to Irfan that appears here on not_honyaku is
> considered improper.
>
Why?  He and I conducted a very proper discussion.
Is it the subject-matter that bothers you (talk of urination
defecation, and breast-sucking)?
>
> Roland
>
Roland, I am grateful for your attempt to explain all this.
Forgive me for my obtuseness.
-- Mark Spahn  (West Seneca, NY)


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Persons posting messages to not_honyaku  assume all responsibility for 
their messages. The list owner does not review messages prior to posting, 
and accepts no responsibility for the content of messages posted.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to