[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13792759#comment-13792759
 ] 

Keith Turner commented on ACCUMULO-1773:
----------------------------------------

Discussed this with [~ecn] and [~ctubbsii] and we decided to only use the 
suffix /<accumulo dir>/tables/<table id>/<tablet dir>/<file> for determining if 
a file is referenced.   Since file names are unique this should not lead to 
false negatives (decide not to delete something that should be deleted).  But 
even if it did, a bug w/ false negatives would be preferable to false 
positives.   

> Garbage collector may delete referenced files after upgrade
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-1773
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1773
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: master, tserver
>            Reporter: Keith Turner
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>
> Looking at the srouce code, it seems like the garbage collector uses a 
> mixture of relative and absolute paths when determining what files to delete. 
>  I think if a deletion candidate is an absolute path and the reference is a 
> relative path then it could delete the referenced file.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to