keith-turner commented on a change in pull request #2152:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/2152#discussion_r648439120
##########
File path:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/metadata/schema/TabletsMetadata.java
##########
@@ -233,6 +269,19 @@ public Options forTablet(KeyExtent extent) {
return this;
}
+ @Override
+ public Options forTablets(Collection<KeyExtent> extents) {
+ if (!extents.stream().map(e -> DataLevel.of(e.tableId()))
+ .allMatch(dl -> dl == DataLevel.USER)) {
Review comment:
These are not equivalent. Wrote the little test below.
```java
var dlset = List.of(DataLevel.USER, DataLevel.USER, DataLevel.USER);
System.out.println(!dlset.stream().allMatch(dl -> dl ==
DataLevel.USER));
System.out.println(dlset.stream().anyMatch(dl -> dl == DataLevel.USER));
```
prints
```
false
true
```
The following pattern is equivalent and uses anyMatch. I think it makes the
code longer so not sure its worthwhile. Also not too worried about efficiency
because the expected case is all USER, so normally it will iterator through all
with anyMatch or allMatch.
```java
EnumSet<DataLevel> unsupportedLevels =
EnumSet.complementOf(EnumSet.of(DataLevel.USER));
var dlset = List.of(DataLevel.USER, DataLevel.USER, DataLevel.USER);
System.out.println(!dlset.stream().allMatch(dl -> dl ==
DataLevel.USER));
System.out.println(dlset.stream().anyMatch(dl ->
unsupportedLevels.contains(dl)));
dlset = List.of(DataLevel.USER, DataLevel.ROOT, DataLevel.USER);
System.out.println(!dlset.stream().allMatch(dl -> dl ==
DataLevel.USER));
System.out.println(dlset.stream().anyMatch(dl ->
unsupportedLevels.contains(dl)));
```
This prints
```
false
false
true
true
```
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
