dlmarion commented on a change in pull request #2169:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/2169#discussion_r654364224
##########
File path:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/clientImpl/TableOperationsImpl.java
##########
@@ -728,6 +728,7 @@ public void delete(String tableName)
List<ByteBuffer> args =
Arrays.asList(ByteBuffer.wrap(tableName.getBytes(UTF_8)));
Map<String,String> opts = new HashMap<>();
try {
+ cancelCompaction(tableName);
Review comment:
That's an interesting thought that I did not explore. I can look at
that. I did look at having the Delete fate op call the cancelCompaction fate
op, and that seemed overly complex.
##########
File path:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/clientImpl/TableOperationsImpl.java
##########
@@ -728,6 +728,7 @@ public void delete(String tableName)
List<ByteBuffer> args =
Arrays.asList(ByteBuffer.wrap(tableName.getBytes(UTF_8)));
Map<String,String> opts = new HashMap<>();
try {
+ cancelCompaction(tableName);
Review comment:
@ctubbsii - I backed out my change to TableOperationsImpl and modified
the DeleteTable fate transaction in the manner you described.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
