ctubbsii commented on issue #3233: URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/3233#issuecomment-1615286205
> While clone table was mention, it was also mentioned that the -cc option was causing the issue: > > ``` > Table SRCTABLE is cloned to DESTTABLE using -cc, which adds a table level setting for the above property ``` > ``` > > as far as I can tell, clonetable does not have a -cc option. createtable and createnamespace do. Right, it doesn't. That's why I think it's a bug. Whereas the `-cc, --copy-config` option has the semantics of "use the effective config of this other table as a template", the `clonetable` command has the semantics of `make this table behave like the other one, but with a new name`. So, it should copy over the *actual* config, not the effective config... because that wouldn't be the same. Basically, I think the issue reported here is a mismatch between the user's use case and the actual behavior (the option isn't well-suited for their use case) for the `createtable` command with the `--copy-config` option (something that is being addressed in #3562). But, when it comes to `clonetable` (without any copying options), the same observed problem would be an actual bug, because it's not cloning properly. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
