keith-turner commented on PR #4682: URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/4682#issuecomment-2176399691
>>I'm wondering if https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/4650 (new scan server ref table) should be backported to 3.1. This would mean that in the upgrade from 2.1 to 3.1 the new table would be created and the old and new refs in the metadata table would be cleaned up. > >That seems like a nice clean way to handle the transition. Are there any downsides to doing that? I do not know of any downsides. Backporting that does seems nice because it would avoid having slightly different ways of doing things in the three branches. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
